Sage Or Technocrat As The Ideal Teaching Resources.

The role of a modern teacher is not easy. The objective to impart knowledge, instil a learning ability, an interest in learning and ultimately groom their students towards examination success posses many challenges in modern schooling. The expectations of parents, educational authorities, the schools inspectorate and changes in society are a growing challenge to the average teacher resulting in a significant number falling by the wayside.

The dilemma is how to provide the ideal modern teaching resource extending from early learning through primary to secondary and high school. We need to compare the honed skill of the experienced teacher applying the traditional approach, able to control a class of mixed ability, with that of a computer literate vogue fledgling teacher. But in the contemporary school which has the greater relevance? Modern technology has resulted in significant changes to the teaching resources now used in school. Sophisticated software and a games approach to learning can enliven the class lesson content immeasurably compared to 15 years ago. Educationalists have developed a fun learning approach to education, turning many a dull subject into educational games. This approach has even spurred eminent scholars in education research on the University campus to recognise the advantage of applying greater video game content in education.

But still that question, which of the teaching skills is therefore better matched to the modern classroom. The mature disciplinarian versus the technocrat. A few years ago I had a conversation with a large supplier of “whiteboards” that have appeared in many classrooms. This sophisticated piece of modern electronic wizardry allows the teacher to project information onto a class sized interactive screen and interface with a computer program. The problem is the computer literacy required to make them work effectively is not second nature to many otherwise skilled teachers and many have tended to switch them off having spent most of the lesson trying to master the operation. The supplier found a significant number being used only as a modern “blackboard” with dry wipe pens used instead of chalk. This expensive technical stand-off can be perhaps personified by the “video chasm”, where parents rely on children to operate the video or DVD recorder.

Yet technology is a core element of the curriculum and needs cohesive introduction, or does it? Can anyone recall giving instruction to children on the operation of a mobile phone? Doubtless the skill wasn’t taught at school yet the average child’s speed of operation and use of a phone’s features is phenomenal. Children learn from experimentation, the buzz of immediate feedback and peer support. The hands -on approach has a significant benefit. It would seem there is a need for a mixture of instruction at school and experimentation that might have to extend beyond the school timetable.

So who does make the better teacher; the mature disciplinarian or the technocrat? I believe the mature approach has the edge. Learning is a process that benefits from a sound structure that can be enhanced by technology rather than replaced by it. The early building blocks for learning need to be put in place correctly to guide and enthuse. If this is enhanced through an element of fun in learning English games rather than pure text book slog then so much the better, but in the long run it is the steady experienced and proven approach rather than the fashionable that wins through. Yet the time served teacher is under threat as many are leaving the profession early due to the mounting pressures of the role. And of equal concern the young fledgling that would ultimately become the next generation of mature teacher is also falling by the wayside, with a significant number of new teachers leaving the profession within three years.Perhaps we need to turn education inside out and really get to understand the needs, motivation and experience of teachers and how the system should be best configured. Maybe the experience of an Ofsted inspection on the bureaucrats behind the system could be the start.